Rann grew up living
with Kennedy relatives after his mother Damaris died. Amongst them was George
Kennedy who had built up a reputation as a surgeon in
Birmingham. George worked at the
Hospital until late in life. The name George Kennedy is also constantly found in records of commercial transactions from this period in connection with
the ownership of inns in the Lichfield and Birmingham area - this is because there was another George Kennedy from the Lichfield line, who was in the Brewing trade. They were cousins. Also in these papers many members of the
ubiquitous Rann family are to be found.
George the surgeon acquired a handsome property in Acocks Green called Fox
Hollies, very close to the village of
Yardley that had been the home of his Dolphin ancestors since the Middle
Ages. George was clearly not only a man of medical accomplishments, he also had a
keen sense of family history.
Rann Kennedy was
curate of St Pauls in the centre of Birmingham from the early 1790s. The congregation bought him the living and he
became vicar, from the late 1790s until
close to his death in 1851. St Pauls is
a grand and very elegant Georgian church in what is known as the Jewellery Quarter. Among pew holders at St Pauls at the time
were Matthew Boulton, the industrial
pioneer, owner of the huge factory at Soho
and his partner in the development of
steam engines, James Watt. Watt lived next door to Fox Hollies House.
Rann’s position both
at St Pauls and as usher at the King Edward VI school put him very much at the
heart of the Church of England establishment of Birmingham. Birmingham at this time was a city sharply divided on
sectarian lines. Dissent there dated
from the Civil War when it was a stronghold of the Parliamentarian side. In the years after the French Revolution the
town’s resident ‘Church and King’ mob terrorised the many nonconformists and
free thinkers. They attacked the house
of Joseph Priestley, the famous Unitarian, scientist and philosopher, one of
the leading lights of the Lunar Society,
pulling it down and leading him to flee to America. The Birmingham mob also destroyed Moseley
Hall outside the town on hearing that a dinner had been lately held there in
honour of the Jacobins. The permanent
occupant was an old and genteel lady with no political connections whatever and
the owner of the property certainly had no knowledge of the infamous dinner. The mob allowed the old lady to leave then
literally pulled the place apart. They
also attacked dissenter places of worship such as Quaker Meeting Houses. In the 1820s the pupils of the King Edward
School would clash in the streets with dissenter apprentices. Rann was certainly a strong monarchist, as were many of his generation who were
horrified by the excesses of the French Revolution.
It was a common thing
for poetic clergymen to compose poetry but not to publish their work, to publish was widely regarded as vulgar. Luckily several of the works were published during and after his lifetime. Rann’s poems were highly regarded by literary
circles but especially amongst the “Church and King” sections of the
population. His poem upon the succession of George IV was read out to a packed
theatre at the time by a prominent actor, one Mr Vandenhoff.
One of his poems that
has survived concerns the death of
Princess Charlotte. This poem
might be viewed as a (heavily) veiled attack on the then King George IV, previously the Prince Regent, who was held in
very low estimation by many Britons. He
had tried to divorce his wife, resulting in a court case which dragged her
reputation through the mud and was the cause of much rioting and protest on her
behalf. Her daughter Princess Charlotte
was seen as an innocent amongst the scandal-ridden royal family and some
radicals used the opportunity of her death to attach yet more ignominy to the
King.
One letter to him that
is held by the family is from Samuel Coleridge, his old friend from University, and is a lengthy critical appreciation
of this poem.
Washington
Irving, the American author best known
for writing ‘The Legend of Sleepy Hollow’ was a great ambassador of American
letters to Britain and Europe. He
visited the Kennedys and became a great friend of Rann and Julia, finding the rector of St Pauls a lovable
eccentric. Rann would regale his circle of friends with his works which he
kept in his head. Irving was also
particularly amused by the educationalist, clergyman, Greek Scholar and academic Samuel Parr,
who in his later years was a frequent visitor to the Kennedy household.
Parr was the rector of
Hatton, on the road between Warwick and
Birmingham. He was a cantankerous man
who had purposefully modelled himself, as a raconteur, on Doctor Johnson, though some have said without the authority
or humour of that distinguished Lichfieldian. He had met and spent time with
Johnson and had managed to parry the inevitable barbs that the old Tory
launched in his direction. He wrote the
epitaph on Johnson’s tomb – in fact he did so for Fox, Gibbon and many others of the distinguished
departed. He was a diehard Whig and had
corresponded, or conversed with all of the Whig politicians and thinkers of his
era. He liked to be known as a very
particular gourmand, and he would make
fearful demands at dinnertime, much to the fury of Julia Kennedy, according to Washington Irving. One project of Parr’s was to preserve a well
from which Richard III was believed to have refreshed himself before the Battle
of Bosworth. This was done after much
negotiation with local farmers and
landowners, though the numbers of
subsequent visitors to Dick’s Well was not recorded.
Parr was a radical
throughout his life. In the 1780s he was
an enthusiastic fund raiser for Charles James Fox. In the 1820s he was an associate of the
Unitarian Joseph Parkes who campaigned for democracy during the repressive
period after the Napoleonic wars. Parkes
was hardly the sort of figure that radicals would have pictured in company with
Rann Kennedy but nonetheless they shared a very good friend in Parr.
One of their shared
interests was education. Parr had at one
time been fancied to take the headmastership of Harrow and the boys there had
rioted when he was not awarded the position by the governors. He went along to talk the boys out of their
protest. This is interesting because he
was noted as a strong proponent of corporal punishment in schools. He was a frequent visitor to Shrewsbury
School whilst Rann’s eldest son Benjamin Hall Kennedy was a pupil there, and
often attended at prize givings. When Parr died on March 5th
1825, Rann officiated at the funeral
which was in Birmingham.
Meanwhile King
Edward’s School had become the centre of controversy. The headmaster Reverend J Cooke MA was a
ferocious disciplinarian and the physical punishments were such that even in
those birch-happy times parents began to complain. The complaints received short shrift from the
head. Rann was one of the principal
staff members in charge of meting out punishments. To be fair physical violence was common in
the schools of the period, much of it
dealt out by the boys themselves who were frequently fighting each other –
sometimes in class - or scrapping with
locals outside the school walls. The
policy of the King Edward’s School as elsewhere was generally to condone fist
fighting amongst the pupils as long as it was a ‘fair fight’.
Education had changed
little in the King Edward VI School since the days of Queen Elizabeth when the
first post-Catholic education system was put in place. Classes in the school at the time of Rann
Kennedy involved the pupils gathering around an outer railing and listening to
the teacher, usually lecturing on Latin
or Greek. There was some mathematical
teaching but little of any other
subject. French was discontinued on
grounds of patriotism. Classical
learning was believed to contribute to building a sound character in a
boy, though the ex-pupils seem to have
found Latin and Greek of little direct use in their subsequent careers. The fact that so many educated men in
Victorian England shared a background in these studies led to a profound bond
between many of them, able to converse
in their ancient tongues. The influence
of the Classics pervaded the nineteenth century in many very subtle ways and
stood for a lot. In the mid-twentieth
century a Kennedy son was asked something in Latin by his great uncle, and when he was unable to answer the great
uncle was mystified that a Kennedy boy was not a classics scholar.
Radicals in the town
are said by some writers to have reviled Cooke and Kennedy for their repressive
regime. However when he retired, he was honoured by the townspeople so it is
clearl not everyone felt that way.
Also Kennedy was a prominent supporter of the campaign for equal rights for Roman
Catholics in Birmingham in the 1830s, so in this respect he was ahead even of the future
great reformer Gladstone who at that time was resisting those changes in
Parliament.
King Edwards School by
Rann’s time had fallen into a dilapidated state. The grant to maintain it was
limited by statute, and therefore it
needed to amended by Act of Parliament.
The governors moved for a bill in Parliament to rebuild the school. Naturally they wanted it to be a Church of
England school as before, with them in
control. The dissenting community of
Birmingham protested loudly and used their growing influence in Parliament to
try and kill the bill. The school was in
a desperate state - for example a large hole had appeared in Rann’s kitchen floor.
Eventually the bill
was ushered through parliament with the Established Churchmen maintaining their
grip on the rebuilt school. The period
of this bill was the culmination of conflict between the Dissenting communities
of Birmingham and the adherents of the Church of England. At times this conflict manifested itself yet
again in open violence on the streets, some of it
involving pupils of King Edwards School alleged by some to be orchestrated
among the staff.
Rann retired from the
school soon afterwards, upon the
retirement of Reverend Cooke. He was too
old to succeed Cooke by this time.
Though late in life, Reverend Rann continued to be the rector of St
Paul’s Chapel. In the last years of his life he collaborated on some latin
translations with the son to whom he was particularly close, Charles
Rann Kennedy, who had become a barrister.
The old scholar was still as sharp as ever. He also finally published some of his own
poetry.
Rann Kennedy as a man represented many
different and seemingly conflicting things to many people during his life. To some this poses to the biographer an
impossibility. How can a man be a
puzzling eccentric, a profoundly spiritual figure, friend to a radical, a devout royalist, a poet, married to the worlds of theatre and
art, a great teacher, loving father,
brutal disciplinarian and accessory to
municipal despotism? But the fact is
that he was all these things and more.
As we glimpse Rann Kennedy in the few remains he left behind, and in the eyes of others, his life demonstrates the futility of
attempting to summarise a life in a few sentences.
More on Rann here
More on Rann here
No comments:
Post a Comment